The Basic Law is definitely unconstitutional! (a satire)

The Basic Law of the old BRD (Federal Republic of Germany, not to be confused with the new BRD, i.e., the Black Rock Dependance that will take over the government on May 6, 2025) is, according to Article 146, not a constitution, but a provisional measure until "... a constitution comes into force that has been freely decided upon by the German people." However, this view is outdated. Like the rules-based world order, whose rules were never written down, the constitutional order of the old BRD is dynamic. In the rules-based world order, the rules of the West apply to the entire world, with 15% of the world's population. And, of course, even these 15% are not asked for their opinion. Where would we be if socialism (Latin: socius = partner), communism (Latin: commune = common), and populism (Latin: populus = people - translations by Google Translate), i.e. partnership, community, and the people, ruled - a clear violation of the constitutional order. Democracy, on the other hand, is when the institutions of the state are protected from populism, i.e., from the people.

Despite many amendments, the 1949 text still contains many provisions that are incompatible with the current constitutional order. For example, Article 22, Paragraph 2 states: The federal flag is black, red, and gold. Yet everywhere you see either yellow and blue or red, orange, yellow, green, light blue, dark blue, and purple. Black, red, and gold stands for nationalism and is certainly right-wing extremist. Article 116 of the Basic Law (GG) defines the people as ethnically and descent-based. According to the findings of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, this is definitely right-wing extremist (see https://www.tagesschau.de/kommentar/afd-einstufung-rechtsextrem-100.html). And according to Article 20, Paragraph 2, all state power should emanate from the people. However, if this people is defined by ethnic origin, not only are all immigrants excluded from state power, but the people could even elect populists. The provision of Article 38, Paragraph 1, that members of parliament elected in general, direct, free, equal, and secret elections should be the representatives of the people and not of the population, rather than adhering to the mandates and instructions of lobbyists, is ultimately the height of unconstitutionality. How is the new BRD supposed to govern according to the current constitutional order?

of the federal territory, and take precedence over the law, one can argue that anti-constitutional pamphlets such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of December 10, 1948 (UDHR) or the European Convention on Human Rights of November 4, 1950 (ECHR), which was even expressly ratified by the old Federal Republic of Germany on August 7, 1952, would actually be applicable.

According to Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms proclaimed therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, skin color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status. This provision was incorporated into the Basic Law by Article 3, paragraph 3, sentence 1 of the Basic Law (GG), which states: "No one shall be discriminated against or favored because of their sex, ancestry, race, language, homeland and origin, faith, religious or political opinions." However, the use of the word "race" is demonstrably right-wing extremist. It implies that there are human races such as Caucasian (e.g., European), East Asian (e.g., Chinese), South Asian (e.g., Indian), or African, just as there are horse breeds such as the Trakehner or Hanoverian. This contradicts human dignity, is racist, and therefore unconstitutional. Finally, it must be possible to change one's identification as Caucasian, East Asian, South Asian, or African every year, since one can change one's gender every year.

Article 3, paragraph 2, sentence 1 of the Basic Law also stipulates that men and women have equal rights, but not equal treatment. Equality is equal opportunity, while equal treatment is equal outcome. The terms are thus opposites. Furthermore, it is anti-queer to seek equal treatment of only men and women, but not the other 98 genders. This clearly violates human dignity and is certainly right-wing extremist.

The anti-LGBTQXYZ attitude of the old order is particularly evident in Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). According to these, only men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and found a family. Article 16, paragraph 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) even stipulates that this heterosexual family is the natural and fundamental unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state. Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, which states that marriage and family are under the special protection of the state order, is less specific. Here, the anti-constitutional sentiment stems from outdated human rights that cannot be modernized in the UN due to the blockade of 85% of the world's population. Of course, a rules-based world order cannot be guided by these firmly right-wing extremist, outdated rules.

Article 10, paragraph 1 of the ECHR grants everyone the right to freedom of expression. This right includes freedom of opinion and the freedom to receive and impart information and ideas without official interference and regardless of national borders. According to Article 5, paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, everyone has the right to freely express and disseminate their opinions in speech, writing, and pictures, and to obtain information from generally accessible sources without hindrance. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting through radio and film are guaranteed. As long as this refers to the right of publishers to publish their opinions, this is unproblematic; after all, they depend on advertising revenue. However, censorship should also be avoided. But this is certainly unconstitutional, because only the state authorities, the mainstream media, and the established parties that support the current structures are constitutionally friendly. If government critics are then allowed to criticize the government in principle, unhindered governance is no longer possible. This cannot be tolerated.

According to Article 6 (3) (a) of the ECHR, every accused person has the right to be informed, within the shortest possible time and in a language they understand, in full detail of the nature and grounds of the accusation against them. Of course, this cannot apply to anti-constitutional parties, even though they are legal entities and can invoke the ECHR. But where would we be if a domestic intelligence agency subordinate to the Federal Ministry of the Interior had to explain in detail why it considers this party to be definitely right-wing extremist in a report of over 1,000 pages? Then this argument could be discussed. The former President of the Robert Koch Institute already stated in mid-2020 that discussion is not allowed.

It is therefore crucial to suppress any serious criticism of the government. In doing so, however, Walter Ulbricht's directive must be observed: "It must appear democratic, but we must have everything under control." (Walter Ulbricht quoted in Wolfgang Leonhard: Die Revolution entlässt ihre Kinder (1955). Leipzig 1990, p. 406. Brandenburg State Agency for Political Education quoted from https://gutezitate.com/zitat/102122). This requires a certain amount of tact.

Captain Kirk had a ray weapon on the Starship Enterprise called the Faeser, which he could continuously adjust between stun and full power. Captain Scholz on the Starship Federal Government also has a Faeser as multi-purpose weapon in the fight against right-wing extremism, which was set to full power again on May 2, 2025, shortly before its decommissioning, to defend the constitutional order. And she was beaming while doing so. His second beam weapon, for defending the rules-based world order, was set to stun. It remains to be seen which weapons Captain Merz intends to use, and whether they will also beam like that.